Check Publications

Marshall, B. L., Dalmer, N. K., Katz, S., Loos, E., López Gómez, D., & Peine, A. (2022). Digitization of aging-in-place: an international comparison of the value-framing of new technologies. Societies, 12(2), 35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020035

Katz, S., Peters, K. R., & Ballantyne, P. J. (2020). The Preventive Uncertainty of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): The Experts, the Market, and the Subjects of Diagnosis. In A. Leibing & S. Schicktanz (Eds.), Preventing Dementia?: Critical Perspectives on a New Paradigm of Preparing for Old Age (pp. 151–172). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781800734982-009

Köttl, H., Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., & Ayalon, L. (2021). “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971

Katz, S., Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Thane, P. (2021). “To Understand All Life as Fragile, Valuable, and Interdependent”: A Roundtable on Old Age and History. Radical History Review, 2021(139), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-8822578

Chivers, S. (2021). “With Friends Like These”: Unpacking Panicked Metaphors for Population Ageing. Societies, 11(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030069

Grenier, L. (2021). « Bien vieillir » : l’individu rendu responsable de sa longévité et de sa santé. Agir Par La Culture, 64, 26–28. https://www.agirparlaculture.be/bien-vieillir-lindividu-rendu-responsable-de-sa-longevite-et-de-sa-sante/

Katz, S. (2021). Afterword: Why Socio-gerontechnology today. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 248–255). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-22/afterword-stephen-katz

Lafontaine, C., & Sawchuk, K. (2021). Age matters: Senior exclusions, designing consultations and a municipal action plan for age-(un)friendly cities. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 147–161). Routledge.

Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2021). Age, actors and agency: what we can learn from Age Studies and STS for the development of Socio-gerontechnology. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 24–41). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-2/age-actors-agency-learn-age-studies-sts-development-socio-gerontechnology-anna-wanka-vera-gallistl

Lee, K., & Marier, P. (2021). Aging in Place With a Spouse in Need: Neighborhood Cohesion and Older Adult Spouses’ Physical and Mental Health. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 93(4), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020974616

Marshall, B. L., Dalmer, N. K., Katz, S., Loos, E., López Gómez, D., & Peine, A. (2022). Digitization of aging-in-place: an international comparison of the value-framing of new technologies. Societies, 12(2), 35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020035

Katz, S., Peters, K. R., & Ballantyne, P. J. (2020). The Preventive Uncertainty of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): The Experts, the Market, and the Subjects of Diagnosis. In A. Leibing & S. Schicktanz (Eds.), Preventing Dementia?: Critical Perspectives on a New Paradigm of Preparing for Old Age (pp. 151–172). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781800734982-009

Köttl, H., Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., & Ayalon, L. (2021). “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971

Katz, S., Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Thane, P. (2021). “To Understand All Life as Fragile, Valuable, and Interdependent”: A Roundtable on Old Age and History. Radical History Review, 2021(139), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-8822578

Chivers, S. (2021). “With Friends Like These”: Unpacking Panicked Metaphors for Population Ageing. Societies, 11(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030069

Grenier, L. (2021). « Bien vieillir » : l’individu rendu responsable de sa longévité et de sa santé. Agir Par La Culture, 64, 26–28. https://www.agirparlaculture.be/bien-vieillir-lindividu-rendu-responsable-de-sa-longevite-et-de-sa-sante/

Katz, S. (2021). Afterword: Why Socio-gerontechnology today. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 248–255). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-22/afterword-stephen-katz

Lafontaine, C., & Sawchuk, K. (2021). Age matters: Senior exclusions, designing consultations and a municipal action plan for age-(un)friendly cities. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 147–161). Routledge.

Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2021). Age, actors and agency: what we can learn from Age Studies and STS for the development of Socio-gerontechnology. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 24–41). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-2/age-actors-agency-learn-age-studies-sts-development-socio-gerontechnology-anna-wanka-vera-gallistl

Lee, K., & Marier, P. (2021). Aging in Place With a Spouse in Need: Neighborhood Cohesion and Older Adult Spouses’ Physical and Mental Health. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 93(4), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020974616

Marshall, B. L., Dalmer, N. K., Katz, S., Loos, E., López Gómez, D., & Peine, A. (2022). Digitization of aging-in-place: an international comparison of the value-framing of new technologies. Societies, 12(2), 35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020035

Katz, S., Peters, K. R., & Ballantyne, P. J. (2020). The Preventive Uncertainty of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): The Experts, the Market, and the Subjects of Diagnosis. In A. Leibing & S. Schicktanz (Eds.), Preventing Dementia?: Critical Perspectives on a New Paradigm of Preparing for Old Age (pp. 151–172). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781800734982-009

Köttl, H., Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., & Ayalon, L. (2021). “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971

Katz, S., Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Thane, P. (2021). “To Understand All Life as Fragile, Valuable, and Interdependent”: A Roundtable on Old Age and History. Radical History Review, 2021(139), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-8822578

Chivers, S. (2021). “With Friends Like These”: Unpacking Panicked Metaphors for Population Ageing. Societies, 11(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030069

Grenier, L. (2021). « Bien vieillir » : l’individu rendu responsable de sa longévité et de sa santé. Agir Par La Culture, 64, 26–28. https://www.agirparlaculture.be/bien-vieillir-lindividu-rendu-responsable-de-sa-longevite-et-de-sa-sante/

Katz, S. (2021). Afterword: Why Socio-gerontechnology today. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 248–255). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-22/afterword-stephen-katz

Lafontaine, C., & Sawchuk, K. (2021). Age matters: Senior exclusions, designing consultations and a municipal action plan for age-(un)friendly cities. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 147–161). Routledge.

Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2021). Age, actors and agency: what we can learn from Age Studies and STS for the development of Socio-gerontechnology. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 24–41). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-2/age-actors-agency-learn-age-studies-sts-development-socio-gerontechnology-anna-wanka-vera-gallistl

Lee, K., & Marier, P. (2021). Aging in Place With a Spouse in Need: Neighborhood Cohesion and Older Adult Spouses’ Physical and Mental Health. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 93(4), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020974616

Marshall, B. L., Dalmer, N. K., Katz, S., Loos, E., López Gómez, D., & Peine, A. (2022). Digitization of aging-in-place: an international comparison of the value-framing of new technologies. Societies, 12(2), 35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020035

Katz, S., Peters, K. R., & Ballantyne, P. J. (2020). The Preventive Uncertainty of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): The Experts, the Market, and the Subjects of Diagnosis. In A. Leibing & S. Schicktanz (Eds.), Preventing Dementia?: Critical Perspectives on a New Paradigm of Preparing for Old Age (pp. 151–172). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781800734982-009

Köttl, H., Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., & Ayalon, L. (2021). “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971

Katz, S., Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Thane, P. (2021). “To Understand All Life as Fragile, Valuable, and Interdependent”: A Roundtable on Old Age and History. Radical History Review, 2021(139), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-8822578

Chivers, S. (2021). “With Friends Like These”: Unpacking Panicked Metaphors for Population Ageing. Societies, 11(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030069

Grenier, L. (2021). « Bien vieillir » : l’individu rendu responsable de sa longévité et de sa santé. Agir Par La Culture, 64, 26–28. https://www.agirparlaculture.be/bien-vieillir-lindividu-rendu-responsable-de-sa-longevite-et-de-sa-sante/

Katz, S. (2021). Afterword: Why Socio-gerontechnology today. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 248–255). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-22/afterword-stephen-katz

Lafontaine, C., & Sawchuk, K. (2021). Age matters: Senior exclusions, designing consultations and a municipal action plan for age-(un)friendly cities. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 147–161). Routledge.

Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2021). Age, actors and agency: what we can learn from Age Studies and STS for the development of Socio-gerontechnology. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 24–41). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-2/age-actors-agency-learn-age-studies-sts-development-socio-gerontechnology-anna-wanka-vera-gallistl

Lee, K., & Marier, P. (2021). Aging in Place With a Spouse in Need: Neighborhood Cohesion and Older Adult Spouses’ Physical and Mental Health. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 93(4), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020974616

Marshall, B. L., Dalmer, N. K., Katz, S., Loos, E., López Gómez, D., & Peine, A. (2022). Digitization of aging-in-place: an international comparison of the value-framing of new technologies. Societies, 12(2), 35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020035

Katz, S., Peters, K. R., & Ballantyne, P. J. (2020). The Preventive Uncertainty of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): The Experts, the Market, and the Subjects of Diagnosis. In A. Leibing & S. Schicktanz (Eds.), Preventing Dementia?: Critical Perspectives on a New Paradigm of Preparing for Old Age (pp. 151–172). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781800734982-009

Köttl, H., Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., & Ayalon, L. (2021). “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971

Katz, S., Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Thane, P. (2021). “To Understand All Life as Fragile, Valuable, and Interdependent”: A Roundtable on Old Age and History. Radical History Review, 2021(139), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-8822578

Chivers, S. (2021). “With Friends Like These”: Unpacking Panicked Metaphors for Population Ageing. Societies, 11(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030069

Grenier, L. (2021). « Bien vieillir » : l’individu rendu responsable de sa longévité et de sa santé. Agir Par La Culture, 64, 26–28. https://www.agirparlaculture.be/bien-vieillir-lindividu-rendu-responsable-de-sa-longevite-et-de-sa-sante/

Katz, S. (2021). Afterword: Why Socio-gerontechnology today. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 248–255). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-22/afterword-stephen-katz

Lafontaine, C., & Sawchuk, K. (2021). Age matters: Senior exclusions, designing consultations and a municipal action plan for age-(un)friendly cities. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 147–161). Routledge.

Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2021). Age, actors and agency: what we can learn from Age Studies and STS for the development of Socio-gerontechnology. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 24–41). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-2/age-actors-agency-learn-age-studies-sts-development-socio-gerontechnology-anna-wanka-vera-gallistl

Lee, K., & Marier, P. (2021). Aging in Place With a Spouse in Need: Neighborhood Cohesion and Older Adult Spouses’ Physical and Mental Health. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 93(4), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020974616

Marshall, B. L., Dalmer, N. K., Katz, S., Loos, E., López Gómez, D., & Peine, A. (2022). Digitization of aging-in-place: an international comparison of the value-framing of new technologies. Societies, 12(2), 35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020035

Katz, S., Peters, K. R., & Ballantyne, P. J. (2020). The Preventive Uncertainty of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): The Experts, the Market, and the Subjects of Diagnosis. In A. Leibing & S. Schicktanz (Eds.), Preventing Dementia?: Critical Perspectives on a New Paradigm of Preparing for Old Age (pp. 151–172). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781800734982-009

Köttl, H., Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., & Ayalon, L. (2021). “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971

Katz, S., Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Thane, P. (2021). “To Understand All Life as Fragile, Valuable, and Interdependent”: A Roundtable on Old Age and History. Radical History Review, 2021(139), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-8822578

Chivers, S. (2021). “With Friends Like These”: Unpacking Panicked Metaphors for Population Ageing. Societies, 11(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030069

Grenier, L. (2021). « Bien vieillir » : l’individu rendu responsable de sa longévité et de sa santé. Agir Par La Culture, 64, 26–28. https://www.agirparlaculture.be/bien-vieillir-lindividu-rendu-responsable-de-sa-longevite-et-de-sa-sante/

Katz, S. (2021). Afterword: Why Socio-gerontechnology today. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 248–255). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-22/afterword-stephen-katz

Lafontaine, C., & Sawchuk, K. (2021). Age matters: Senior exclusions, designing consultations and a municipal action plan for age-(un)friendly cities. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 147–161). Routledge.

Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2021). Age, actors and agency: what we can learn from Age Studies and STS for the development of Socio-gerontechnology. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 24–41). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-2/age-actors-agency-learn-age-studies-sts-development-socio-gerontechnology-anna-wanka-vera-gallistl

Lee, K., & Marier, P. (2021). Aging in Place With a Spouse in Need: Neighborhood Cohesion and Older Adult Spouses’ Physical and Mental Health. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 93(4), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020974616

Marshall, B. L., Dalmer, N. K., Katz, S., Loos, E., López Gómez, D., & Peine, A. (2022). Digitization of aging-in-place: an international comparison of the value-framing of new technologies. Societies, 12(2), 35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020035

Katz, S., Peters, K. R., & Ballantyne, P. J. (2020). The Preventive Uncertainty of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): The Experts, the Market, and the Subjects of Diagnosis. In A. Leibing & S. Schicktanz (Eds.), Preventing Dementia?: Critical Perspectives on a New Paradigm of Preparing for Old Age (pp. 151–172). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781800734982-009

Köttl, H., Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., & Ayalon, L. (2021). “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971

Katz, S., Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Thane, P. (2021). “To Understand All Life as Fragile, Valuable, and Interdependent”: A Roundtable on Old Age and History. Radical History Review, 2021(139), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-8822578

Chivers, S. (2021). “With Friends Like These”: Unpacking Panicked Metaphors for Population Ageing. Societies, 11(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030069

Grenier, L. (2021). « Bien vieillir » : l’individu rendu responsable de sa longévité et de sa santé. Agir Par La Culture, 64, 26–28. https://www.agirparlaculture.be/bien-vieillir-lindividu-rendu-responsable-de-sa-longevite-et-de-sa-sante/

Katz, S. (2021). Afterword: Why Socio-gerontechnology today. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 248–255). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-22/afterword-stephen-katz

Lafontaine, C., & Sawchuk, K. (2021). Age matters: Senior exclusions, designing consultations and a municipal action plan for age-(un)friendly cities. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 147–161). Routledge.

Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2021). Age, actors and agency: what we can learn from Age Studies and STS for the development of Socio-gerontechnology. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 24–41). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-2/age-actors-agency-learn-age-studies-sts-development-socio-gerontechnology-anna-wanka-vera-gallistl

Lee, K., & Marier, P. (2021). Aging in Place With a Spouse in Need: Neighborhood Cohesion and Older Adult Spouses’ Physical and Mental Health. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 93(4), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020974616

Marshall, B. L., Dalmer, N. K., Katz, S., Loos, E., López Gómez, D., & Peine, A. (2022). Digitization of aging-in-place: an international comparison of the value-framing of new technologies. Societies, 12(2), 35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020035

Katz, S., Peters, K. R., & Ballantyne, P. J. (2020). The Preventive Uncertainty of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): The Experts, the Market, and the Subjects of Diagnosis. In A. Leibing & S. Schicktanz (Eds.), Preventing Dementia?: Critical Perspectives on a New Paradigm of Preparing for Old Age (pp. 151–172). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781800734982-009

Köttl, H., Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., & Ayalon, L. (2021). “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971

Katz, S., Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Thane, P. (2021). “To Understand All Life as Fragile, Valuable, and Interdependent”: A Roundtable on Old Age and History. Radical History Review, 2021(139), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-8822578

Chivers, S. (2021). “With Friends Like These”: Unpacking Panicked Metaphors for Population Ageing. Societies, 11(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030069

Grenier, L. (2021). « Bien vieillir » : l’individu rendu responsable de sa longévité et de sa santé. Agir Par La Culture, 64, 26–28. https://www.agirparlaculture.be/bien-vieillir-lindividu-rendu-responsable-de-sa-longevite-et-de-sa-sante/

Katz, S. (2021). Afterword: Why Socio-gerontechnology today. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 248–255). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-22/afterword-stephen-katz

Lafontaine, C., & Sawchuk, K. (2021). Age matters: Senior exclusions, designing consultations and a municipal action plan for age-(un)friendly cities. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 147–161). Routledge.

Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2021). Age, actors and agency: what we can learn from Age Studies and STS for the development of Socio-gerontechnology. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 24–41). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-2/age-actors-agency-learn-age-studies-sts-development-socio-gerontechnology-anna-wanka-vera-gallistl

Lee, K., & Marier, P. (2021). Aging in Place With a Spouse in Need: Neighborhood Cohesion and Older Adult Spouses’ Physical and Mental Health. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 93(4), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020974616

Marshall, B. L., Dalmer, N. K., Katz, S., Loos, E., López Gómez, D., & Peine, A. (2022). Digitization of aging-in-place: an international comparison of the value-framing of new technologies. Societies, 12(2), 35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020035

Katz, S., Peters, K. R., & Ballantyne, P. J. (2020). The Preventive Uncertainty of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): The Experts, the Market, and the Subjects of Diagnosis. In A. Leibing & S. Schicktanz (Eds.), Preventing Dementia?: Critical Perspectives on a New Paradigm of Preparing for Old Age (pp. 151–172). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781800734982-009

Köttl, H., Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., & Ayalon, L. (2021). “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971

Katz, S., Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Thane, P. (2021). “To Understand All Life as Fragile, Valuable, and Interdependent”: A Roundtable on Old Age and History. Radical History Review, 2021(139), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-8822578

Chivers, S. (2021). “With Friends Like These”: Unpacking Panicked Metaphors for Population Ageing. Societies, 11(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030069

Grenier, L. (2021). « Bien vieillir » : l’individu rendu responsable de sa longévité et de sa santé. Agir Par La Culture, 64, 26–28. https://www.agirparlaculture.be/bien-vieillir-lindividu-rendu-responsable-de-sa-longevite-et-de-sa-sante/

Katz, S. (2021). Afterword: Why Socio-gerontechnology today. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 248–255). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-22/afterword-stephen-katz

Lafontaine, C., & Sawchuk, K. (2021). Age matters: Senior exclusions, designing consultations and a municipal action plan for age-(un)friendly cities. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 147–161). Routledge.

Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2021). Age, actors and agency: what we can learn from Age Studies and STS for the development of Socio-gerontechnology. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 24–41). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-2/age-actors-agency-learn-age-studies-sts-development-socio-gerontechnology-anna-wanka-vera-gallistl

Lee, K., & Marier, P. (2021). Aging in Place With a Spouse in Need: Neighborhood Cohesion and Older Adult Spouses’ Physical and Mental Health. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 93(4), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020974616

Marshall, B. L., Dalmer, N. K., Katz, S., Loos, E., López Gómez, D., & Peine, A. (2022). Digitization of aging-in-place: an international comparison of the value-framing of new technologies. Societies, 12(2), 35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12020035

Katz, S., Peters, K. R., & Ballantyne, P. J. (2020). The Preventive Uncertainty of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): The Experts, the Market, and the Subjects of Diagnosis. In A. Leibing & S. Schicktanz (Eds.), Preventing Dementia?: Critical Perspectives on a New Paradigm of Preparing for Old Age (pp. 151–172). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781800734982-009

Köttl, H., Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., & Ayalon, L. (2021). “But at the age of 85? Forget it!”: Internalized ageism, a barrier to technology use. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100971

Katz, S., Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Thane, P. (2021). “To Understand All Life as Fragile, Valuable, and Interdependent”: A Roundtable on Old Age and History. Radical History Review, 2021(139), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-8822578

Chivers, S. (2021). “With Friends Like These”: Unpacking Panicked Metaphors for Population Ageing. Societies, 11(3), 69. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc11030069

Grenier, L. (2021). « Bien vieillir » : l’individu rendu responsable de sa longévité et de sa santé. Agir Par La Culture, 64, 26–28. https://www.agirparlaculture.be/bien-vieillir-lindividu-rendu-responsable-de-sa-longevite-et-de-sa-sante/

Katz, S. (2021). Afterword: Why Socio-gerontechnology today. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 248–255). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-22/afterword-stephen-katz

Lafontaine, C., & Sawchuk, K. (2021). Age matters: Senior exclusions, designing consultations and a municipal action plan for age-(un)friendly cities. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 147–161). Routledge.

Wanka, A., & Gallistl, V. (2021). Age, actors and agency: what we can learn from Age Studies and STS for the development of Socio-gerontechnology. In A. Peine, B. L. Marshall, W. Martin, & L. Neven (Eds.), Socio-gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology (pp. 24–41). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429278266-2/age-actors-agency-learn-age-studies-sts-development-socio-gerontechnology-anna-wanka-vera-gallistl

Lee, K., & Marier, P. (2021). Aging in Place With a Spouse in Need: Neighborhood Cohesion and Older Adult Spouses’ Physical and Mental Health. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 93(4), 1012–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415020974616